Tuesday, November 03, 2009

ACTRESSES OF THE 1980'S



Vilma Santos achieved a rare feat during the 80's which was never accomplished by any other performer, male or female. In 1983, Santos hit the grand slam by winning Best Actress in all the award giving bodies for her performance in Ishmael Bernal's Relasyon (Regal Films, Inc., 1982). Although the first trophy she got during the decade was from the FAMAS for Pakawalan Mo Ako (MVP Pictures, Inc., 1981), Santos really delivered her best performances in Relasyon, Sister Stella L. (Regal Films, 1984) and Pahiram Ng Isang Umaga (Regal Films, 1989). Playing the part of Marilou, a sympathetic mistress in Relasyon, her performance was consistently good from start to finish. In fact, she was brilliant in the film's small moments, especially in that seemingly insignificant scene where she tried to dismiss persistent suitor Junjun (Jimi Melendez). In Mike de Leon's Sister Stella L., the growth and development of her character was clearly evident. especially in her transformation from a non-partisan religious to a highly politicized nun who gets involved in a labor dispute. In Pahiram Ng Isang Umaga, Ishmael Bernal's very competent handling of the material, coupled with Santos' intelligent portrayal of Juliet, a terminally ill cancer victim, saved the film from becoming a glorified soap opera. Her other fine fine performances during the 80's were displayed in films like Broken Marriage (Regal Films, 1983), Tagos Ng Dugo (V.H. Films, Inc., 1987) and Saan Nagtatago Ang Pag-Ibig? (VIVA Films, 1987) . Santos' most underrated performance during the decade undoubtedly was in Lino Brocka's Adultery Aida Macaraeg Case No. 7892 (Regal Films, 1984). Her sympathetic portrayal of an adulteress could easily have won for her nominations in all the award giving bodies, except that the film was overshadowed by the more prestigious Sister Stella L. which was also released during the same year.

Overshadowed by Vilma Santos during the 80's was Nora Aunor who undisputedly was the brightest star of the 1970's. Aunor, however, still gave some really outstanding performances particularly during the decade's first half. For instance, she started the 1980's with her sensitive portrayal of a faithful alalay in Brocka's Bona (NV Productions). In 1982 it wasn't a miracle that she was proclaimed Metro Manila Film Festival Best Actress for playing the part of Elsa, a young woman who claimed to have witnessed an apparition in Bernal's Himala (Experimental Cinema Of The Philippines). 1984 was another banner year for Aunor. Although she only made three movies that year, she was outstanding in all three. 'Merika ( Adrian Films), Condemned (NV Productions / Golden Dragon Films International) and Bulaklak Sa City Jail (Cherubim Films) which won for her four acting trophies. Of the three films she finished in 1984, Aunor came out best in 'Merika. Her appearance in the film was memorable because for the first time she played a completely different part, so unlike the usual api-apihan roles she churned out in the past. Playing the role of Milagros Cruz, a Filipino nurse in the U.S., Aunor attacked her role with quiet sensitivity that proved to be so refreshing and breathtaking as some of the American sceneries featured in the film. Another sensitive Nora Aunor portrayal was in Mario O'Hara's Bakit Bughaw Ang Langit? (Four Seasons Films, International), the movie that launched Dennis Roldan to stardom in 1981. In the 1985 Metro Manila Film Festival, Aunor gave a vivid portrayal of Amy Mercado, a singer on her way down in the commercial venture I Can't Stop Loving You (Regal Films). Although she managed to rise way above such pulp material, it was sad that her beautiful performance in the film was ignored by critics and film reviewers who refused to take this Elwood Perez film seriously. In 1989, Aunor only made one film, Bilangin Ang Bituin Sa Langit (Regal Films), her fiery performance in the movie won for her three acting awards from the Film Academy Of The Philippines URIAN and FAMAS. Despite the emergence of young superstars Maricel Soriano and Sharon Cuneta during the decade, Nora Aunor and Vilma Santos remained the Actresses of the 1980's.

Sunday, November 01, 2009

LAST VIEWING... An Affirmation Of Life And Death



It is a cause for cheer when a filmmaker tries to elevate the very common genre of the melodrama into a rich and intellectually rewarding film experience, such as director Ronaldo Bertubin has done with Last Viewing (Davis Entertainment Productions, 2009). Bertubin has seen in the material an opportunity to put substance to what has often been denigrated as the unthinking man's entertainment, and to a considerable degree, his attempt has been a success. Last Viewing is both a tearjerker and meaningful as a depiction of people in crisis. Laura (Janice de Belen) has been promoted supervisor at a memorial home crematorium. She is also the single mother of Heidi (Maro Panganiban), her five year old autistic daughter. Laura has the means to attend to the less mundane demands of life, examine what may have been an unexamined life. In all these, Bertubin explores the emotional and psychological condition of a woman who makes a living working with dead people and their grieving families. Naturally visible here are the many symbols not only of death but also of life to serve as some kind of counterpoint. Sometimes, they blend with each other, and at other times they are contradicting. From the solemnity of her father's funeral to the stillness of the crematorium, the affirmation of death could hardly be ignored. The most eloquent symbol here of life is the process of acceptance personified by Laura's brother Arnel (Sherwin Ordonez) who cared for their bedridden father until his death. His dream is to work in the Middle East so he can start a new life on his own.

Life may indeed be short but art endures. It is the one thing in this world which is eternal. Philosophical musings like these are not standard soap opera fare and may alienate a lot of ordinary moviegoers, even the more cerebral ones who cannot accept the conventions of the soap opera genre. Woven unobtrusively into the plot, however, they add texture to enrich the drama. In the last scene, the imagery and symbolisms of life and death abound. Laura finds her missing daughter after four long years lying lifeless inside the crematorium. True enough, this reunion scene is highly emotional. This is the striking part of the movie, Laura staring intently as she prepares her daughter's remains for cremation. It's as though she can see herself in Heidi's lifeless body. Last Viewing is clearly a Janice de Belen vehicle. The actress is in almost every frame of the movie exhibiting gradations of emotions. While Sherwin Ordonez, never known for great moments in acting have his moments here. The very idea that he is not overshadowed by his co-star speaks well of his talent. The attempts to raise the level of the melodrama and present insights on life and death provide Last Viewing its greatest strength and wide appeal. How strangely ironic that a film dealing with death could have so much life.

Directed By: Ronaldo Bertubin
Screenplay By: Romualdo Avellanosa
Director Of Photography: Gary Gardoce And Alex Montemayor
Music By: Pepe Manikan
Film Editor: Soon Li Mi
Production Design By: Antonio Chiong
Produced By: Davis Entertainment Productions

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Unleashing The Horrors Of ZUMA


Jun Raquiza's Zuma (Cine Suerte, Inc., 1985) is a filmic take on the macabre set against the spectra of myth. Raquiza presumably resorts to hybridization to underscore the fact that no one paradigm governs how subjectification come to tentative resolutions. The screenplay places Zuma (Max Laurel) in the center of a murderous rampage after being unearthed by an archeological expedition led by Phillip (Mark Gil) and Isabel (Dang Cecilio). Zuma takes a bride, Galela (Racquel Monteza), a madwoman who bore him Galema (Snooky Serna). Her valiant search for Zuma decisively compels her to appropriate strategies, which, while these may excise the demonic curse, place her on new grounds of containment. It is interesting to note how Galema shifts her practice from the clandestine acts of killing, which substantially threaten the conventions of social cohesion, to the assumption of the public role of woman. Such a shift informs much of the ambivalence sustaining the destiny of a social subject who must straddle multiple positions in private and public spheres, as monster, woman, heroine, villainess. The possibilities of creation within the constraints of gender and class relations nourish the terrain in which Zuma takes root, foregrounding the capacities of horror in discussing the ambivalent discourses involved in the construction of modern women and their specific situations.

Zuma attains a degree of difficulty and therefore solicits significant artistic interest. It is interesting because it is sensitive to dimensions. A story of a demigod entombed in an aztec pyramid that shocks a couple of archaeologists out of their wits is only one dimension. For around this plot is the real history that is repressed by a seemingly comfortable order. It is the tale of the son of an aztec serpent God who rips out and eats the hearts of young women. It is this sediment of life that is embodied in this ancient architecture, which is represented not in realistic terms but but in terms that prompt the moviegoer to construe it as a nightmare, a hell into which the innocent is lured, an irrational and impossible place which could only be made contingent on fiction to render it necessarily real. It is this real that differs from the lives of Phillip and Isabel represented luminously by the poreless and seemingly vacant face of Mark Gil and the cluelessness of Dang Cecilio. This sort of reality is vexed until the protagonist is faced with the horror of making a decision to face the creature. That the daughter, the specter of history persist to haunt the apopleptic couple deepens Zuma's dimension. The film is able to maximize the creative powers of Philippine cinema and culture by infusing powerful metaphors and allegories into the concept of blood ties as site of struggle. Zuma vividly translates into film medium, these distillations, produce a mise-en-scene and a rhythm momentum that hack the imperatives of social contestations which , because intelligently horrific, is very cinematic.

Directed By: Jun Raquiza
Screenplay: Manny Rodriguez & Hernan Robles
Based From Characters Created By Jim Fernandez Serialized In Aliwan Komiks
Cinematography: Alfonzo Alvarez
Musical Director: Marita Manuel & Demet Velasquez
Film Editor: Serafin Dineros
Production Design: Interformat
Produced By: Cine Suerte, Inc.

Zuma will be screened at the Mogwai Cinematheque from October 26-31, 2009 at 9pm

Sunday, October 18, 2009

SERBIS... Sa Likod Ng Sine



Bold ang oryentasyon ng Serbis (Centerstage Productions / Swift Productions, 2008) ngunit may kutob akong maiigpawan ng direktor ang kalabisan ng genre. Noong 2005 kasi, ginawa ni Brillante Mendoza ang Masahista, isang natatanging hayop sa gubat ng bold. Sa madaling salita, inasahan kong magagawan ng paraan ni Mendoza ang kalakal at kalakaran ng paglalako ng katawan sa sine sa kasalukuyan. Nabuhayan ako ng loob sa mga unang eksena ng pelikula. Ang lunan ng naratibo ay isang luma at patakbuhing sinehan sa Pampanga na pinamumugaran ng mga sex worker, bakla, mga nagpaparaos na mga lalaki at parokyano ng mga pelikulang bold. Nagmistulang bulwagan ng salamin ang pelikula, ito ay palabas na bold tungkol sa pagpapalabas ng bold. At masinsin naman ang pagsasametapora ng ng mekanismo ng pelikula sa pamamagitan ng pagsasalarawan ng maliit na silid ng projectionist, ang pag-ikot ng negatibo at pagtagos ng ilaw sa isang singaw na sinisingawan din ng usok ng sigarilyo at init ng katawan, ang sira-sirang mga upuan na ginaganapan ng krimen ng bawal na seksuwalidad. Pinaghaharian ang milyung ito ni Nanay Flor (Gina Pareno) at mga anak na sina Jewel (Roxanne Jordan) at Nayda (Jaclyn Jose) kasama ang asawang si Lando (Julio Diaz) at anak na si Jonas (Bobby Jerome Go), nariyan din ang projectionist na si Ronald (Kristofer King). Sa sinehang ito rin naninirahan si Alan (Coco Martin) at ibubunyag ang di inaasahang pagdadalantao ng nobyang si Merly (Mercedes Cabral). Sayang na sayang at hindi napangatawanan ng pelikula ang mayabong na tema at diskurso ng naratibo. Mapapansin na pagkatapos na maipundar ang milyu, hindi na alam ng direktor kung paano paandarin ang istorya. Sapat nang ipasubo ang ang bida sa mga kung-anu-anong sitwasyong nangangailangan ng paghuhubad.

Pero maliban sa pagtukoy sa kahinaang ito na siya naman talagang bumalda sa pelikula, napag-iisip ng pelikulang ito ang manonood tungkol sa parametro ng kanilang pagbasa kung ilalapat ang mga ito sa isang obrang tulad ng Serbis. Kung estilo at estilo lamang ang pag-uusapan, walang sinabi ang mga pumupormang magagaling na direktor sa kasalukuyan. Ngunit may iba pa tayong dapat pagkaabalahan bukod sa teknik at teknolohiya at pagpapakitang gilas sa larangan ng visual effects. Tinatanong ko ang aking sarili, halimbawa, kung paano matutugunan ng pelikula ang mga kumplikadong isyu na sa unang tingin ay wala namang kinalaman sa sine. Paano kaya mapapalawak ng kritisimong pampelikula ang kanyang abot-tanaw para masipat ang ibang salik na tila labas na sa saklaw ng kanyang tradisyon? Halimbawa, ang antropolohiya ng panonood ng sine. Mababanaag sa pelikulang ito na ang sine ay hindi lamang tekstong pinag-aaralan, kundi isang kulturang isinasabuhay. Talagang napapanahon nang pagtuunan ng pansin ang proseso ng pagtanggap sa pelikula ng mga manonood. Katunayan, sa kasong ito, hindi naman pinapanood ang pelikula, dahil ang sinehan ay nagiging lunan ng ibang gawain. At kung pinapanood naman, nag-uudyok ito ng ibang uri ng alaala at pangitain, napasisiklab nito ang karanasan ng trauma. Sa mga pagkakataong ito, dapat umangkat na ang kritiko ng mga konsepto at metodo sa disiplina ng agham panlipunan para maipaliwanag ang maselang relasyon ng sine at sinehan, imahe at trauma at kung anu-ano pa. Mahalaga rin dito ang usapin ng matriyarka kung saan ang isang matapang na babae ang pumasok sa katauhan ng bana. Siya ba ay humahalili sa lalaki? Bakit binabawian siya ng kagandahang loob at pinagmumukhang sakim? Sa tingin ko, ito ang punot-dulo ng lahat, ang paraan ng ating pagtingin ang siyang susi sa kung anuman ang ating nakikita. Kung makitid ang ating pananaw, wala tayong gaanong makikita at makukulong tayo sa sa kakitiran ng ating mga paniniwala.

Direksiyon: Brillante Ma. Mendoza
Dulang Pampelikula: Armando Lao
Sinematograpiya: Oddysey Flores
Musika: Gian Gianan
Editing: Claire Villa-Real
Disenyong Pamproduksiyon: Benjamin Padero At Carlo Tabije
Prodyuser: Centerstage Produtions At Swift Productions

Thursday, October 01, 2009

PALIPAT-LIPAT PAPALIT-PALIT... Scenes From A Marriage



Palipat-Lipat Papalit-Palit (HPS Productions, 1982) never swerves from its goal. From start to finish, it is a portrait of two people and the bond which they discover smothering and smoldering. The movie has tons of humor, the caustic swaps, the funny characterizations, the clever plotting so that the conditioned response for a supposedly serious movie shifts irrevocably to playful irreverence. It is a masterly stroke, the proverbial Lino Brocka sleight of hand at work, this time with more gusto and style. But none may claim that his treatment loses its mark of delineating the disadvantages of separation. The humor chisels the message so that it comes to us double edged while doing its duty of alleviating an otherwise gloomy impression which accompanies every disillusioning subject matter. Not only does it come through humorously but also simply. The screenplay plunges right into the boiling point, the issues hurled to the foreground like the familiar scenes of hatred and division treated like aimless confetti so that the moviegoer neither breathes nor is excused. It jolts at the outset and after the terrible whipping, when the squabbles lessen and finally ebb into peace, we realize that these two handsome people must have had only one tragic flaw, they did not keep mum for a while. Alvaro de Guzman's cinematography dances with the jetstyle rhythm of the two protagonists. From the clever blocking of their wedding day to the hurried bustle of the television studio. the camera sweeps avidly and flawlessly. In his hands, the incessant quarrels of Chuck (Christopher de Leon) and Carissa (Dina Bonnevie) seem like vengeful lovemaking. The long shots are more developed here. Above all, de Guzman's camera has humor and pathos. The production design never digresses from its limited scope but manages to make poetry out of bedrooms and artificial television set-ups. The claustrophobia one feels at the outset of the movie easily renders the hopelessness of the couple's situation. The music filters the emotions of the characters with a detached but effective air. Rene Tala's splendid editing is a breathless canvass of cosmopolitan animation.

The supporting actors are remarkable. Mark Gil as David, Carissa's gay musician friend is not to be denied mention. Chuck's ex-girlfriend Betsy played by Martha Sevilla is a relaxed performer with a talent for effortlessness. Christopher de Leon endows the character of Chuck with the right sense of machismo and basic weakness. When Chuck is compelled to act maturely, de Leon unflinchingly turns him even more childish with useless tantrums, and when Chuck finally learns his lesson, de Leon adds a boyish smile as if the lesson was amusing. We watch de Leon, elated and entertained, he is never so old as to appear too distant, nor is too young as to seem undocile. He is not propelled to be more manly since his character is made to contribute to a lot of oversights, de Leon doesn't have to put a mask of strength, he just has to be himself and act with ease. Dina Bonnevie is not about to be a letdown. She infuses new intelligence in her portrayal of Carissa. Like de Leon, she turns Carissa into a woman-child, but the stress is less on her part. Her beautiful face is flush receptive, the quiet moments of just observing the people around her are moments of perfect acting. Her body moves with an agility that is both funny and dramatic. Her two monologues, the first with David when she informs him that she is unhappy and the second with Chuck when she asks him what's wrong, are her best scenes. The camera lingers upon her countenance and she enunciates in return with ironic ease, there is simply no stopping her.

Directed By: Lino Brocka
Screenplay: Bibeth Orteza
Cinematography: Alvaro de Guzman
Music: Tito Sotto & Boy Alcaide
Film Editor: Rene Tala
Production Design: Joey Luna
Produced By: HPS Productions

Older Posts